Hi all.Today we will postpone the construction of a quantum computer a little, because.To. dropsy for Broadwell is still on the way. But don’t despair, now we will compare our computer with the most expensive laptop in Moscow. First watch the video.
Yandex, Market section, there are computers, laptops, sort by price, expensive first: First on the list is Asus ROG – the 980th video card; this is old. The next MSI on Xeon is not for games. Getac – this one is for war. Next MSI on a 1080 video card, but low rating – 3.5. Everything below is either outdated or not for games.
Next Asus ROG – i7@2.7Ghz, 1080 video card, FullHD resolution, for 17 you don’t need more, but there are only 4 sellers. The price is most likely too high – more than a quarter of a million after all. Then again either outdated or not for games.
Asus ROG i7@2.6Ghz 1080 video, FullHD 238 thousand.17′ diagonal, 32 RAMs, 8 videos, SSD per terabyte, in fact, they put two 512 in raid 0, to double the performance and of course Samsung – they are the leaders in this area.USB 3.1, Thunderbolt 3, 3.8 kg, 35 mm thickness – this is a gift for a gaming laptop.From 239 thousand. Great – let’s take it.
120hz matrix, awesome keyboard with backlight, very high quality product, materials – everything is just brilliant.So let’s move on to the tests.And first, let’s squeeze all the juice out of it.Mafia 3. Maximum possible settings. A small turbo boost, 3100Mhz, immediately catches your eye, but watching the temperature you understand where this frequency comes from. 96 degrees is no joke, even milk boils after 5 minutes of playing. Joke.
And the FPS is 50 percent https://piratespinscasino.net/login/ less than on a stationary device, but still within the playable value of 40 frames per second. By the way, these 40-50 fps don’t remind you of anything? Look at the stationary Ryzen – one to one! How far is AMD from Intel?. When will there be a third company that will surpass Intel?. You can’t do anything in this life on your own, no one will do anything.OK.BattleField 1.
The same thing here, the difference in FPS is on average 30%. Ultra settings – resolution scale 100%, t.To. on a 17-inch monitor the pixels are so small that the graphics already seem photorealistic. And increasing the scale will only put an extra load on the video card, but will remove it from the processor, which in our case is useful, and if we set it to 150%, then we are guaranteed 70-80 fps, with rare drops to 60, which is basically enough for this game.Well, by and large the picture is already clear, it will be 30-50% weaker than our stationary one, but thanks to the 17′ monitor with very fine grain, for any games, in ultra settings, with one hundred percent scaling, it will be enough.Don’t believe me? Look!Andromeda.
Absolute Ultra – 100% zoom. 65 frames minimum, of course, if you turn up the scale the laptop will show 30 frames, but we don’t need it on the 17. And Mass Effect turned out to be very futuristic and instilling limitless perspectives.
And if anyone decides to take a look at the most advanced girl, Tomb Rider will help, and 60 fps at minimum on ultra, with two times the native resolution will be confirmation of this.And in this part, Larka is very good.Etc.To. the laptop loses to our computer in all disciplines, we don’t need it anymore, let it go to the grandmothers and eaglets with some small daredevil.
We continue to wait for our quantum computer. I remind you that you can watch the whole story of the fall of Ryzen on my blog.
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Mafia III
Battlefield 1
Best comments
At this moment I wanted to get up, go to the bedroom and cry into my pillow for a day. (((
And regarding the review of the laptop: the rule is once again confirmed that “a laptop, no matter how sophisticated it is, is not a gaming machine”. Although, my wife had her eye on it for her use..
Just how long will this laptop last without recharging?? How much does it weigh? And thus we get a desktop laptop. Although it would seem that we kind of wanted mobility?
There is a difference between mobility and autonomy. Yes, it is unlikely to work autonomously under load for a long time, although 1.5-2 hours is quite normal time for laptops (And a stationary one from a UPS only works for a few minutes). But he is still much more mobile than a hospital patient. It is clear that the laptop has many shortcomings, but that’s why it has a different form factor, so that you replace some inconveniences at the expense of others.
What are you talking about?? The blog clearly shows what laptops can do, and how. Yes, much more expensive and hemorrhoids, but nevertheless. However, laptops have always been able to play games, but in light of the fact that now they have begun to install full-fledged analogues of desktop video devices, in general everything has become much more cheerful.